Kubuntu 6.06
With all the Ubuntu excitement passed few days it occurred to me that being a KDE fan moreso than gnome, perhaps Kubuntu might be more my cup of tea. When perusing the downloads it also occurred to me that 'hey I have a 64bit machine now!' So, I downloaded the Kubutu 6.06 desktop amd64 iso. Was it more appealing to a diehard KDE fan? Does 64bit programming make much difference?
The boot is similar to Ubuntu's, in fact it's almost identical except for the more attractive blue coloring and instead of the Ubuntu goldish logo we have the blue kubuntu. Otherwise there didn't seem to be much difference until we reached the splash screen. As attractive as Ubuntu's gui splash might be, kubuntu's is much more so. It's clean and crisp, and I just personally prefer blue.
Once you reach the desktop, one finds a blue background that looks like large faint bubbles as a foundation for KDE 3.5.2. It is your basic KDE desktop consisting of kapps for most popular tasks. What's not included on in the iso is installable. Included graphics are Kooka, krita, kpdf, and gwenview. For Internet we find akregator, bluetooth chat, Konqueror, Konversation, kopete, Kppp, krdc, drfb, ktorrent and a wireless lan manager. Multimedia includes amaroK, K3b, Kaffeine, KAudioCreator, kmix, and KsCD.
OpenOffice.org 2.02 rounds up the office category as well as KDE deciding kontact is an office application. There are plenty of system tools and utilities as well. There are utils for software packaging, setting alarms, configuring groupware connections, managing your printing jobs, and calculating. System tools consists of Kcron, Keep, KInfocenter, KSysGuard, KSystemLog, Konsole and QTParted.
On the desktop as well as in the System menu is an icon for Install. Installing to the harddrive is simplified over comparable Linux system, and in this case it is very similar if not identical to the process found in Ubuntu. It starts with answering a few configuration questions such as language, timezone, keyboard, and user and machine name.
Next comes partitioning if necessary and setting the target partition and swap. Confirm settings and press Install. All one does now is wait. It takes about 10 minutes for the installer to complete it's work before asking if you'd like to reboot. That's it.
Like Ubuntu, the installer presumes you would like grub installed so doesn't bother to ask and my first install attempt wasn't successful. The newly installed system would not boot. It just sat at the 'loading grub' screen blinking at me, in much the same manner as I encountered with the Ubuntu release candidate. After replacing grub with lilo, kubuntu tried to boot, but lots of things failed including the loading of needed modules and the start of the gui. I booted the livecd and tried again, this time doing nothing else in the background and achieved a bootable install. The first time I was taking a bunch of screenshots. I think I'm beginning to see a pattern emerge here in all my installs of the Ubuntu family and can sum it up in a few words of advice. Do not do anything else while your new Ubuntu system installs. This of course detracts from the main advantage of using a livecd as an install medium, but on the other hand, it takes such a short span of time to install that it's not a major sacrifice.
The installed system affords one the opportunity to install whatever applications one might need as well any 3rd party or proprietary drivers. (k)ubuntu software is installed thru an app called adept. Not only is it an software manager, but it also takes care of system or security updates. In fact one of the first thing I saw when I booted Kubuntu the first time was an icon in the System tray for adept and clicking on it brought up an updater. Click to fetch list of updates and in a few seconds it will inform you if anything needs updating. In this case there were updates to the adept software manager and gnome install data. One can Apply Updates or Forget Changes and Quit. I clicked Apply Changes and the updates were downloaded and installed in seconds without issue.
In the menu is an entry for Adept which opens a window similar to Synaptic. You can search for specific packages by keywork with tickable options, and right click package name to "Request Install." Then click on the Apply Changes button and your package as well as dependencies are downloaded and installed.
Clicking on "Add and Remove Programs" also brings up adept, but in a different layout. In this layout one finds the applications available or installed listed by category. Ticking the little checkbox and clicking Apply Changes will install or remove chosen programs.
The hardware detection was good and pretty much everything worked out of the box. Kaffeine was able to play mpgs and the example files but not avis. OpenOffice crashed and disappeared my first attempt at using it, but functioned properly in all subsequent tests. The KDE that was included was a bit stripped down and included no games at all, but lots of choices are available through the software manager. The desktop itself was pretty even if customized very little. Under the hood is a 2.6.15 kernel, Xorg 7.0 and gcc 4.0.3 is installable.
The performance of the system was well above average. In fact, I'll just say it, that thing flies. Applications opened up before I could move my mouse. There was no artifacting or delay in redrawing windows, no delay at all in switching between windows, or "jerkiness" when moving windows around. The menu popped right open without delay as well. The whole system felt light and nimble. I was quite impressed. Comparing the performance of kde kubuntu to gnome ubuntu is almost like comparing peaches to nectarines and since I didn't test the x86 version of kubuntu, I can't say with any authority or expertise that kubuntu 64 out-performs the others. But I can say this is one of the, if not the, fastest full-sized systems I've tested. Yes sir, kubuntu was quite impressive.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- 82931 reads
- PDF version
More in Tux Machines
- Highlights
- Front Page
- Latest Headlines
- Archive
- Recent comments
- All-Time Popular Stories
- Hot Topics
- New Members
digiKam 7.7.0 is releasedAfter three months of active maintenance and another bug triage, the digiKam team is proud to present version 7.7.0 of its open source digital photo manager. See below the list of most important features coming with this release. |
Dilution and Misuse of the "Linux" Brand
|
Samsung, Red Hat to Work on Linux Drivers for Future TechThe metaverse is expected to uproot system design as we know it, and Samsung is one of many hardware vendors re-imagining data center infrastructure in preparation for a parallel 3D world. Samsung is working on new memory technologies that provide faster bandwidth inside hardware for data to travel between CPUs, storage and other computing resources. The company also announced it was partnering with Red Hat to ensure these technologies have Linux compatibility. |
today's howtos
|
Kubuntu 6.06 Review
Thanks for your review.
Just a few personal comments about this new release.
FIRST, THE BAD . . .
1) Yes, I profoundly dislike NOT being able to log in as root. Granted, I don't spend much time logged-in as user root, but when I'm going to do an extended session of system configuration and maintenance, it's the fastest, most efficient way. And, of course, Linux is supposed to be about choice.
So I googled "Kubuntu root login", and got to a Kubuntu forum where some user had asked the same question. In the forum, the next person had posted in reply (I'm paraphrasing here): I know how to enable root logins for Kubuntu, but I'm not going to tell you how because this is not a good idea.
I just couldn't believe my eyes. OSS is all about freedom and the ability to control your own machine. "THERE'S NO INFORMATION HIDING IN LINUX!!!" (Imagine Tom Hanks in the movie, A League of Their Own saying "There's no crying in baseball!")
As I sat there thinking about this, I began to think that these Ubuntu/Kubuntu folk are a different kind of folk than me--alien, strange, ungracious, and infuriating. All that wondering about the popularity of Ubuntu/Kubuntu increased. Why would anyone want to use a distro where a simple request for information was received with such an ignorant, uptight, shortsighted, narrowminded, hypocritical, and outright anal response?
Working myself up to a good simmer, now, I then look at the next post in the forum, where a user quietly and considerately told exactly how to do it. OK, maybe these Kubuntu folk aren't jerks. Too much rush to judgement and stereotyping going on in our world anyway.
2) I'm not too familiar with Debian, or Debian based distros--so this one is probably my fault. I couldn't get Nvidia's accelerated drivers working properly. I have an older 17" LCD monitor that still works great, but it's very fussy about sync rates. I can usually tinker around and get things working, but no go here. I admit I was impatient here, and if I'd spent more time, I could have gotten it to work.
3) Development compilers and libraries are not included with the basic live CD install. There is such a thing as designing a distro for beginners, but not treating them like idiots. Can't find a package for your distro that works? Then, you can get the source and compile your own. Basic tools to do this, in my opinion, should always be included with the basic install of a Linux distro.
NOW, THE GOOD.
1) I like the graphical package installer, Adept. It works well, and is well designed and integrated.
2) Despite the heavy load the Ubuntu/Kubuntu servers must have been undergoing with a new release, they were quick and responsive.
3) I agree with every thing srlinux had to say in her (typically excellent) review, particularly when she says Kubuntu is very fast and responsive. I installed the amd64 version, and speed was excellent.
4) Kubuntu very courteously found all the other distros on my hard disks, and added them to the Grub boot menu. If all distros would do this, installing and trying out multiple distros would certainly be easier.
Well, that's it. I think it might be interesting to see an in-depth comparison of the latest Mepis(ver. 6, rc4) to this new Kubuntu release.
Gary Frankenbery
re: Kubuntu 6.06 Review
Thanks for your review.
Just a few personal comments about this new release.
FIRST, THE BAD . . .
1) Yes, I profoundly dislike NOT being able to log in as root. Granted, I don't spend much time logged-in as user root, but when I'm going to do an extended session of system configuration and maintenance, it's the fastest, most efficient way. And, of course, Linux is supposed to be about choice.
Yeah, I didn't like that one too much, especially when the ubuntus hit the pipes. I'm used to it now I guess and it only annoys me slightly when I forget to sudo a command. I found just setting a root password will fix that tho.
teehee on the tom hanks thing.
3) Development compilers and libraries are not included with the basic live CD install. There is such a thing as designing a distro for beginners, but not treating them like idiots. Can't find a package for your distro that works? Then, you can get the source and compile your own. Basic tools to do this, in my opinion, should always be included with the basic install of a Linux distro.
Yeah, that used to really urk me too. But like the sudo thing, I'm getting used to it. I'm seeing it more and more in distros these days. A comment on another site said to install the build-essentials to get gcc, make, and friends. It was nice seeing that comment before my installs that way I didn't have to get all annoyed at it.
Thanks for your kind words for me, I really appreciate that.
----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?
It's not as bad as it looks
1) Yes, I profoundly dislike NOT being able to log in as root.
I must admit that I created a root password on the first machines where I installed Ubuntu. (sudo passwd) But now I just let the root user blocked and use (sudo su) to get a shell that has root rights and exit it again after some system maintenance. It is possible more secure that script kiddies cannot login as root via ssh (not standard installed but the first thing I usually install) even if they try really hard.
2) I couldn't get Nvidia's accelerated drivers working properly.
After installing the nvidia package (apt-get install nvidia-glx) I usually run the reconfiguration of xorg by (dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg) this creates a new /etc/X11/xorg.conf file including sync ranges. This tool always shows the options chosen the last time it has run so it is easy to use multiple times to tweak things.
3) Development compilers and libraries are not included with the basic live CD install.
It is easy to correct (apt-get install build-essential) but many people don't need those tools. The current repositories are packed with all kind of usefull software. It is very seldom that I revert to debian-unstable to get sources of something and repack it to create an ubuntu version of the same project.
Re: It's not as bad as it looks
Also thanks for your clarification on installing the development packages.
Kubuntu is definitely on my radar. It was certainly blazingly fast.
Regards,
Gary Frankenbery
Computer Science Teacher
Grants Pass High School, Oregon, USA