|Blog entry||Why should Microsoft fans want (even help!) Linux to succeed||L||21/10/2008 - 5:35am|
|Story||today's leftovers||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 3:46am|
|Story||OpenOffice.org 3.0 scores strong first week||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 3:33am|
|Story||Worldwide 2009 Mandriva Linux Installfest||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 3:26am|
|Story||Community vs. Commercial GNU/Linux Distributions||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 3:24am|
|Story||Open Source Is Far From Free||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 3:22am|
|Story||Ubuntu 8.10 “Intrepid Ibex” feels more like a service pack than a new release||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 1:00am|
|Story||How much have you saved by using GNU/Linux?||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 12:58am|
|Story||Mandriva 2009 on the Asus EeeBox||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 12:57am|
|Story||Review: Pioneer Dreambook Light IL1||srlinuxx||21/10/2008 - 12:55am|
Here's a story on a board game based on and entitled Doom: The Board Game. This is apparently not breaking news, but I just heard about and got a chuckle over it a few days ago. But hey, I think it might make a neato gift for those diehard doom series lovers, or those who wished they could have played doom3 but couldn't swing the hardware upgrade! Get yours here!
Seems Mr. Gates is at it again with saying one thing while trying to cleverly conceal his jabs at Linux. This time speaking of interoperability amongst differing architectures while stating that doesn't mean open source as open source is detrimental to interoperability. Does that seem backwards to anyone else besides me? This is posted all over the net, but here's one reference at Betanews.