Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Fav Distro (2006)

Mandriva
5% (18 votes)
Fedora
7% (27 votes)
Slackware
7% (28 votes)
PCLinuxOS
9% (36 votes)
Gentoo
7% (29 votes)
SUSE
23% (90 votes)
Debian
6% (24 votes)
(k)Ubuntu
27% (106 votes)
Open/Free/PC-BSD
2% (6 votes)
Other
7% (27 votes)
Total votes: 391

Re: 10 top Linux distros and the 90 others ?

atang1 wrote:

And we need to reach the other three major Linux distros? Mepis, Knoppix and Damn Small Linux, even though they are forks of Debian or (K)ubuntu. Brands were established, that people did not want to crossover the line.

I really wanted to put a mepis and knoppix in there, but I didn't want to deviate too far away from last years polls or the results wouldn't mean as much for my purposes of comparison.

If DSL, Knoppix, could be included under debian, that'd be great, and I guess ... where is mepis now? under debian or ubuntu.

I had to put ubuntu by itself due to its massive popularity.

But as you say, I'd need 90 choices to get almost everybody's favorite. Big Grin

Favorite distro : Archlinux

Favorite distro : Archlinux ( not in list )
Favorite DE : KDE

trick question?

Kind of a trick question. For big servers, it's RHEL, for small servers it's Fedora, for Desktops it Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS. I don't think there is one Distro that fits every need. That's both the boon and bane of Linux (so many choices).

Fav Distro (2006)

It's been over a year since our last Favorite Linux Distribution poll, and I thought it would be interesting to find out how thing compare. If you'll notice, Ubuntu wasn't even listed on last years. Since Xandros had very little interest last year, I've replace it with Ubuntu.

Please use these categories broadly.

Please post your 'other.'

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

More in Tux Machines

Ubuntu: Unity, Mir, and Snapd

  • Ubuntu Touch Q&A 23
    The developers have been hard at work on Xenial! ARM64 now working on Ubuntu Touch, and applications launch! As many modern CPUs don't include 32-bit compatibility mode, ARM64 native mode on UT can start to make use of more modern CPUs.
  • UBports Continues Working On Unity 8, Developer ISO Coming
    While Canonical is no longer involved in Unity 8 development, the community-driven UBports team continues working on their "Unity 8" and "Ubuntu Touch" efforts with a hope to deliver a developer ISO soon. Sadly the Yunit project that also forked Unity 8's code-base doesn't seem to be active at least not regularly anymore, but the UBports team is working on delivering. In their latest Q&A session they share that Unity 8 on the desktop is coming together. One of the developers commented, "While it's both good and pretty, it's not 'pretty good'."
  • This Week In Mir (16th Feb, 2018)
  • Snapd 2.31 Better Supports Wayland Via Mir, Canonical Hires Another Mir Developer
    Besides Mir 0.30 being released this week, other Mir progress was also made by these Canonical developers working on forging Mir into a viable Wayland compositor. Gerry Boland of Canonical's Mir team has shared that Snapd 2.31 now supports any Snap implementing the Wayland interface. This allows for Mir to be shipped as a Snap and support Wayland clients using Canonical's app sandboxing approach alternative to Flatpaks.

Debian: The SysVinit Migration, Debian Debates, and package-hosting repository,

  • The SysVinit upstream project just migrated to git
    Surprising as it might sound, there are still computers using the traditional Sys V init system, and there probably will be until systemd start working on Hurd and FreeBSD. The upstream project still exist, though, and up until today, the upstream source was available from Savannah via subversion. I am happy to report that this just changed.
  • futures of distributions
    Seems Debian is talking about why they are unable to package whole categories of modern software, such as anything using npm. It's good they're having a conversation about that, and I want to give a broader perspective.
  • What is Debian all about, really? Or: friction, packaging complex applications
    This weekend, those interested in Debian development have been having a discussion on the debian-devel mailing list about "What can Debian do to provide complex applications to its users?". I'm commenting on that in my blog rather than the mailing list, since this got a bit too long to be usefully done in an email.
  • Updated my package-repository
    Yesterday I overhauled my Debian package-hosting repository, in response to user-complaints.

Games: Silver Case, Mercury Race, Ignorance is Strength, OpenRA and More

Future of Wine Staging

  • Future of Wine Staging
    Some of you may have already wondered why there were no Wine Staging releases lately and whether anything has changed. There are indeed some major changes, which we want to explain in this post. Before doing so, let us take a quick look at the history of this project. Wine Staging originated from Pipelight, a software to use Windows browser plugins in Linux/FreeBSD web browsers. In order to support Silverlight and its DRM system PlayReady, we had to create our own Wine version as the development code did not support storing Access Control Lists (ACLs) for files. It turned out that getting the support into the development version was quite difficult and Erich E. Hoover tried this since 2012. We figured out that there must be more patches that are considered as too experimental for the development branch and started with Wine Staging in 2014. While the project got larger and larger in roughly 120 releases, the maintenance effort also increased, especially since we follow the 2 week release cycle of the development branch.
  • Wine Staging is no longer putting out new releases
    There have been many people asking questions about the future of Wine Staging, turns out it's no longer going to have any new releases. I won't quote the entire post titled "Future of Wine Staging", but the gist of it is that they just don't have the spare time to put into it now. They have full time jobs, so naturally that doesn't leave much for something like this. I fully understand their situation and wish them all the best, I've seen so many people appreciate the work they did to bring so many different patches together for testing. The good news, is that there's already a fork available. On top of that, Wine developer Alexandre Julliard posted on the Wine mailing list about keeping it going in some form, so there might be light at the end of the tunnel.
  • Wine-Staging Will No Longer Be Putting Out New Releases
    Wine-Staging as many of you have known it for the past four years is unfortunately no more. We'll see if other reliable folks step up to maintain this experimental version of Wine but the original developers have sadly stepped away.