Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

PrBoom Version 2.4.1 is released

Filed under
Gaming

8th April 2006

Version 2.4.1 is released.

  • PrBoom demos are now recorded with high-precision turning (like the "Doom v1.91" hack that is floating around)
  • when both -nodraw and -nosound are supplied, then no graphics will be initialized and no windows opened
  • add ultdoom compatibility level, and bring compatibility levels into line with Prboom+
  • screenshots now use correct palette in software mode
  • screenshots now in PNG format on Linux/Unix where available
  • suppress use-supershotgun key in compatibility mode
  • removed obsolete video related code
  • fix screenshots on 64bit systems
  • fix comp_666

2nd April 2006

Version 2.4.0 is released. This is based on 2.2.6 and includes various
improvements from 2.3.1 and PrBoom+. Special thanks to Andrey 'e6y' Budko
for his bugfixes and his help to add them to PrBoom!

  • emulate reject overflows and spechit overflows - from prboom-plus
  • more original doom compatibility options
  • improve stretched graphics drawing for hires
  • fix super-shotgun reload on last shot
  • fix compilation with gcc 4.x
  • fix some more dehacked support problems (e.g. Hacx)
  • fix crash if pwad contains zero-length sound lumps
  • added possibility to use mmap for wad access, this leads to less memory usage
  • simplified the memory handling
  • removed old Doom v1.2 lumps from prboom.wad
  • windows also uses prboom.wad now
  • add Mac OS X bundle build
  • removed lumps and tables which are in prboom.wad from source



Project Homepage.

More in Tux Machines

Open-Source Radeon 2D Performance Is Better With Ubuntu 14.10

While we're most often looking at the OpenGL 3D performance of the Linux graphics drivers, in the tests currently being done of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 14.10 are also a number of 2D graphics benchmarks. In the article today are our 2D benchmarks between Ubuntu 14.04.1 and Ubuntu 14.10 for various AMD Radeon graphics cards and it shows off significant performance improvements. Read more

Today in Techrights

Today's articles: Links outline:

KDE With Theoretical Client-Side Decorations, Windows 10 Influence

KDE contributor and graphics designer Ken Vermette has penned an interesting series of KDE "What if..." articles where he talks about (and has some visual mock-ups) about what KDE might look like with client-side decorations along and separately if KDE were to use Windows 10 design components. Read more Also: What if… Plasma Used Launchers from Other Systems & Enviornments? (Part 1) What if… KDE Used Windows 10 Design Components?

Pondering FOSS foundations

In the case of the Document Foundation, the LibreOffice project needed an independent, solid and meritocratic entity dedicated to support it. In other terms, the OpenOffice.org community wanted to be its own boss and stop relying on corporate – or even third party – good will. If you attend the Community Track on the 31st you will be able to learn more about the Document Foundation and the other entities, but my message here is that while there is no silver bullet in these matters, forcing a community be hosted or to bend to a software vendor never works. It bends if it wants to; it goes whereever it wishes to go. In the case of the Document Foundation, independence and community rule prevailed over convenience; today the results do not need to be proven anymore. But it does not mean we hold the truth more than anybody else: we just ensured the community was in charge. Read more