Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Why Does Kubuntu Suck?

Filed under
Ubuntu

Why does Kubuntu suck? I don’t think it sucks. However after reading a lot of comments recently on the Internet about the death of Kubuntu and KDE (sarcasm there) a lot of people think it does. I read stuff like:

* “Kubuntu is the worst distro ever!“
* “Kubuntu has been dead since day one“
* “Nobody cares about Kubuntu anyways“

If you are one of those people who have said something like the above recently, why? I want solid reasons and I don’t want to hear stuff like:

rest here




Kubuntu Sucks

Why does Kubuntu suck?

* The name sucks. REAL people would NEVER take it seriously - crash test out loud any conversation with the word "Kubuntu" and you'll feel ultra lame.

* The package manager is overly complicated and lacking simplicity and functionality - the most important piece of ubuntu's success.

* They're not as organized as Ubuntu with Ask Ubuntu, Brainstorm, Centralized Community Forums and a focus on simplicity and simple looks.

Actually, Kubuntu really plays a large role in ruining KDE's name to fame - every time I want to install KDE as a first-class DE Kubuntu is the only distribution that comes to mind - and every release it's terrible does exactly what the name implies - not live up to it's role model Ubuntu.

It's amazingly hard to find a KDE distro debian based - too bad KDE doesn't take on the challenge themselves and create an official distro.

PS: Now that Kubuntu is dropped from the Canonical family and part of Blue Systems - they really need to drop the name - it's just as bad as when Mandrake became Mandriva.

Re: Kubuntu

On the other hand, one can always install Synaptic under Kubuntu with sudo apt-get install synaptic. It's the fastest and simplest package manager I know.

Agreed on the name. But it's only a name.

Actually, I've installed the last three versions of Kubuntu on one of my home machines...and I find the KDE stuff has become better and better. (I Haven't yet installed Kubuntu "Precise Pangolin").

With Kubuntu's repository sharing with Ubuntu, the package depth and variety is amazing.

Yes, KDE Debian based distros are scarce.

And Kubuntu manages to keep its packages fairly up-to-date without becoming wildly unstable.

While not my preferred daily desktop distro, Kubuntu does have its good points.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more

Only FOSSers ‘Get’ FOSS

Back on the first of September I wrote an article about Android, in which I pointed out that Google’s mobile operating system seems to be primarily designed to help sell things. This eventually led to a discussion thread on a subreddit devoted to Android. Needless to say, the fanbois and fangrrls over on Reddit didn’t cotton to my criticism and they devoted a lot of space complaining about how the article was poorly written. Read more