Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

why you don't rely on uname

Filed under
Linux

It is difficult to be angry at Linus for anything, on the count of how much good he did, and is doing to us with the whole idea of having Linux – it’s not like waiting for a GNU kernel would have helped – but honestly I feel quite bothered that he ended up making the decision of bumping the kernel’s version number like it was just a matter of public relations, without the need to consider the technical side of it, of software relying on the version numbers being, you know, meaningful. Which, honestly, reminded me of something but let’s not get that in front of us.

Let’s ignore the fact that kernel modules started to fail — they would probably be failing because of API changes without the need of anything as sophisticated as a version bump to 3. And let me be clear on one thing at least: it’s not the build failures that upset me – as I said last year I prefer it when packages fail at build time, rather than, subtly, at runtime.

At any rate, let’s begin with the first reason why you should not rely on uname results:

rest here




Dependency on 2.x.x kernel numbering is lazy programming

I would have thought programmers would have considered numbering scheme changes, just as they should have considered century changes in the late 20th century. Just because your kernel dependency check works this month, don't depend on it working 'forever.'

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

GNU/Linux: the desktop that never was

About 6 years ago, I wrote an article about why I felt that installing software in GNU/Linux was broken. It pains me to say that the situation is, sadly, exactly the same:GNU/Linux never made it to personal computers, really, and at this point it looks like it never will. http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/gnulinux_desktop_never_was

GNU/Linux: the desktop that never was

About 6 years ago, I wrote an article about why I felt that installing software in GNU/Linux was broken. It pains me to say that the situation is, sadly, exactly the same:GNU/Linux never made it to personal computers, really, and at this point it looks like it never will. http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/gnulinux_desktop_never_was

UK Government Analyzes Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Security

The UK government releases every year a security guidance that details various problems and security problems that are identified in systems used by the authorities. They also revealed some issues with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, although it's not something major. Read more

AndEX Now Lets You Run Android Lollipop 5.0.2 on Your PC with Linux Kernel 4.0

The AndEX Live DVD that we introduced to you a few weeks ago has been updated today with new features, such as the latest Linux 4.0 kernel. Read more