Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Future openSUSE Versioning Decided

Filed under
SUSE

Andreas Jaeger, openSUSE Program Manager at Novell, has announced the results of the future versioning polls. As reported earlier a discussion concerning the versioning of openSUSE releases emerged with several interesting options. A polling structure was deviced and today the decision is made.

Some of the ideas were to go to a Fedora-style whole number release version such as Fedora 14 or Fedora 15. Another was Ubuntu-style in which the version number reflected the release date such as Ubuntu 11.04 to mean the Ubuntu released in April 2011.

rest here




OpenSUSE

Whew! Glad they got such critical issues worked out now.

I bet in 2013 (or sooner) they'll rethink this great strategy since their number system will make them look old and tired compared to the other distros.

"What, 12.3? Didn't 12.1 come out like 2 years ago. Meh!"

So the versioning scheme is

So the versioning scheme is the same as it was before except there are no .0 versions. What's the point in that!?

It was because of news of this forthcoming poll that I found out that minor point releases are not an improvement over the previous point release, but a brand new rebuild. That would explain why 11.3 was a complete disaster for me (in a number of ways), whilst 11.2 was great. After the bad experience of 11.3 and having read about the problems with 11.4, I am steering clear of openSUSE and its versioning scheme.

That sounded like an openSUSE bash, but I'm only critical about things I care about or have an interest in. I just really think the versioning scheme is wrong.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Today in Techrights

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more