Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Future openSUSE Versioning Decided

Filed under
SUSE

Andreas Jaeger, openSUSE Program Manager at Novell, has announced the results of the future versioning polls. As reported earlier a discussion concerning the versioning of openSUSE releases emerged with several interesting options. A polling structure was deviced and today the decision is made.

Some of the ideas were to go to a Fedora-style whole number release version such as Fedora 14 or Fedora 15. Another was Ubuntu-style in which the version number reflected the release date such as Ubuntu 11.04 to mean the Ubuntu released in April 2011.

rest here




OpenSUSE

Whew! Glad they got such critical issues worked out now.

I bet in 2013 (or sooner) they'll rethink this great strategy since their number system will make them look old and tired compared to the other distros.

"What, 12.3? Didn't 12.1 come out like 2 years ago. Meh!"

So the versioning scheme is

So the versioning scheme is the same as it was before except there are no .0 versions. What's the point in that!?

It was because of news of this forthcoming poll that I found out that minor point releases are not an improvement over the previous point release, but a brand new rebuild. That would explain why 11.3 was a complete disaster for me (in a number of ways), whilst 11.2 was great. After the bad experience of 11.3 and having read about the problems with 11.4, I am steering clear of openSUSE and its versioning scheme.

That sounded like an openSUSE bash, but I'm only critical about things I care about or have an interest in. I just really think the versioning scheme is wrong.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) Daily Build ISO Images Now Available to Download

Canonical's Adam Conrad announced that Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) is officially open for development, and it looks like the first daily build ISO images are already available for download. Read more

Radeon RX 580: AMDGPU-PRO vs. DRM-Next + Mesa 17.2-dev

Last week I posted initial Radeon RX 580 Linux benchmarks and even AMDGPU overclocking results. That initial testing of this "Polaris Evolved" hardware was done with the fully-open Radeon driver stack that most Linux enthusiasts/gamers use these days. The AMDGPU-PRO driver wasn't tested for those initial articles as it seems to have a diminishing user-base and largely focused for workstation users. But for those wondering how AMDGPU-PRO runs with the Radeon RX 580, here are some comparison results to DRM-Next code for Linux 4.12 and Mesa 17.2-dev. Read more

Void GNU/Linux Operating System Adopts Flatpak for All Supported Architectures

Void Linux, an open-source, general-purpose GNU/Linux distribution based on the monolithic Linux kernel, is the latest operating system to adopt the Flatpak application sandboxing technologies. Read more

Top 4 CDN services for hosting open source libraries

A CDN, or content delivery network, is a network of strategically placed servers located around the world used for the purpose of delivering files faster to users. A traditional CDN will allow you to accelerate your website's images, CSS files, JS files, and any other piece of static content. This allows website owners to accelerate all of their own content as well as provide them with additional features and configuration options. These premium services typically require payment based on the amount of bandwidth a project uses. Read more