Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

6 Alternative Ubuntu Desktops Worth Trying

Filed under
Software
Ubuntu

You may have also heard that the next Ubuntu version--Natty Narwhal, version 11.04--will use the 3D-enabled Unity desktop by default instead, along with the Wayland graphics system.

Unity is still based on GNOME, so it won't affect the use of any GNOME-based applications, Canonical says. It will also still be possible to reinstall GNOME, if you really want it.

Nevertheless, desktop environments can vary tremendously, and those differences can have a big effect not just on the appearance but also on the speed of your Ubuntu installation. Now that there are already big changes coming down the pike, this is a particularly good time to take a fresh look at the Ubuntu desktop and all the many free alternatives that are available.

Here are a few particularly worth considering.

1. KDE

KDE is no doubt the best-known alternative to the GNOME desktop, and it's what you're already used to if you run Kubuntu instead of the standard desktop Ubuntu.

KDE and GNOME both offer much the same functionality, differing instead on the way things are presented on the desktop. GNOME's desktop has a reputation for being simpler, while KDE's tends to offer numerous options, causing some people to find it more complicated.

rest here




Task me baby

Most distributions have neat like packages called tasks that allows one to install alternative desktop environments by selecting task-xfce, task-fluxbox, task-kde etc... at least my Mandriva box has these features.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Leftovers: Gaming

Leftovers: Software

today's howtos

ACPI, kernels and contracts with firmware

This ends up being a pain in the neck in the x86 world, but it could be much worse. Way back in 2008 I wrote something about why the Linux kernel reports itself to firmware as "Windows" but refuses to identify itself as Linux. The short version is that "Linux" doesn't actually identify the behaviour of the kernel in a meaningful way. "Linux" doesn't tell you whether the kernel can deal with buffers being passed when the spec says it should be a package. "Linux" doesn't tell you whether the OS knows how to deal with an HPET. "Linux" doesn't tell you whether the OS can reinitialise graphics hardware. Read more