Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

7 months with Windows 7 (a response)

Filed under
Microsoft

Today I cam across a post titled seven months with windows 7. I do not agree 100% with it. Let me tell you why.

Before you continue reading, please take a moment to read the original post, as it is needed to understand my response.

"So, what is it about Windows that makes it as good as, or better than Desktop Linux?"

1. "It does not crash" .- Windows 7 has improved a lot specially compared to Vista, but it is also true that Windows XP does not crash either. If properly used. Here is the catch: If you plan to use your computer for a "normal" work, then any O.S. will manage to support the load. On the other hand, if you want to use your computer to experiment (the typical geek) with new applications, then the O.S. will be prone to fail, unless that O.S., is really stable.

2. "It hasn't slowed down over time".-




If you apply common sense principles it makes a fine OS

There is the whole problem right there. Most Windows users don't use a restricted account. They browse everywhere with Internet Exploder and click on anything that is shiny and blinking. I think Windows 7 has just as many holes as every other version of Windows.

RE: If you apply common sense principles it makes a fine OS

poodles wrote:
There is the whole problem right there. Most Windows users don't use a restricted account. They browse everywhere with Internet Exploder and click on anything that is shiny and blinking. I think Windows 7 has just as many holes as every other version of Windows.

Windows 7 users get a restricted account by default. If it had as many holes as other versions of Windows they would have been exploited by now. I never implied in my article that everyone should use Windows, I only implied that it met my specific needs on one computer (out of many that I own at home).

la tee da da

fewt wrote:
poodles wrote:
There is the whole problem right there. Most Windows users don't use a restricted account. They browse everywhere with Internet Exploder and click on anything that is shiny and blinking. I think Windows 7 has just as many holes as every other version of Windows.

Windows 7 users get a restricted account by default. If it had as many holes as other versions of Windows they would have been exploited by now. I never implied in my article that everyone should use Windows, I only implied that it met my specific needs on one computer (out of many that I own at home).

Oh Mr. Big Shot with many computers at home! Well la tee da da. Sucker! You took my troll bait! heh heh

la dee dah

poodles wrote:
fewt wrote:
poodles wrote:
There is the whole problem right there. Most Windows users don't use a restricted account. They browse everywhere with Internet Exploder and click on anything that is shiny and blinking. I think Windows 7 has just as many holes as every other version of Windows.

Windows 7 users get a restricted account by default. If it had as many holes as other versions of Windows they would have been exploited by now. I never implied in my article that everyone should use Windows, I only implied that it met my specific needs on one computer (out of many that I own at home).

Oh Mr. Big Shot with many computers at home! Well la tee da da. Sucker! You took my troll bait! heh heh

no u.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more

Only FOSSers ‘Get’ FOSS

Back on the first of September I wrote an article about Android, in which I pointed out that Google’s mobile operating system seems to be primarily designed to help sell things. This eventually led to a discussion thread on a subreddit devoted to Android. Needless to say, the fanbois and fangrrls over on Reddit didn’t cotton to my criticism and they devoted a lot of space complaining about how the article was poorly written. Read more