Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Microsoft HPC claim: Windows is cheaper than Linux

Filed under
Linux
Microsoft

Microsoft has made some pretty bold claims about Linux throughout its longstanding love/hate (mostly hate) relationship with the open source operating system.

Complaints about Linux infringing on patents have been pretty commonplace. What you don't hear so often is Microsoft claiming that Windows is cheaper than Linux.

But that is exactly what Microsoft said Monday when it released Windows HPC Server 2008 R2, the latest version of its software for building high-performance computing clusters.

Microsoft: We love open source

"Recent research demonstrates that Windows HPC Server is 32 percent to 51 percent less expensive than Linux-based HPC systems over five years," Microsoft said in a press release.

rest here




Uh Oh - those wacky ms spin doctors are at it again!

Microsoft sponsored studies are always comedy gold, and this one is no exception. Apparently they are quite frustrated by their complete impotence in the supercomputing market, and so they need a study showing some benefit to using microsoft windows for HPC.

Sure thing! so let's start with a flawed premise, and tilt the playing field until our sales pitch sounds like it might have some validity: Let's take a completely insane approach, something which none of the organizations in the top 500 have done (find the absolutely most expensive possible licencing arrangement for our supercomputing cluster) and let's try to fool everyone into thinking that's the typical route for linux shops.

They managed to get some expensive quotes for premium support on hundreds of copies of red hat enterprise, and then, comparing themselves to that nonsensical straw man, and with the aid of several other ridiculous assumptions on their part, they were able to position themselves as being less expensive - surprise, surprise!

Oops, don't spill the beans and let it leak out that no linux cluster in the top 500 was licensed using the ridiculously priced model microsoft tries to pawn off as typical.

Sorry microsoft, even a literate 10 year old could quickly see through this one. Your antics are always so sad, yet funny. I can't wait to hear your next tall tale!

re: spin

Luckily, Unoobtu and it's droolettes never resort to exaggeration (and out right lies) to make their point.

Oh wait - they do it ALL THE TIME.

It's called "marketing" and truth in advertising went out in the - well there never was truth in advertising - it's all about convincing you to part with your money, period.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Android Leftovers

Leftovers: OSS

Ubuntu 16.04 Review: What’s New for Desktop Users

Ubuntu is a tricky distribution. As much as I love it on my home server, my desktop is a different ballgame. In my experience, releases between LTS versions have many new technologies that may or may not survive in the next LTS. There were many technologies or features that Canonical thought were ambitious -- HUD, experimenting with menus, online dash search, Ubuntu Software Center, etc. -- but they were abandoned. So, if I were to use Ubuntu on my desktop, I would still choose LTS. Read more

Workflow and efficiency geek talks Drush and Drupal

I started using Drupal because I needed an open source content management system (CMS) to use in several community projects. One of the projects I was involved with was just getting started and had narrowed its CMS selection down to either Drupal or Joomla. At the time I was using a different framework, but I had considered Drupal in the past and knew that I liked it a lot better than Joomla. I convinced them to go with the new Drupal 6 release and converted all of my other projects for consistency. I started working with Drush because I wanted a unified mechanism to work with local and remote sites. My first major contribution to Drush was site aliases and sql-sync in Drush 3. Read more