Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

No Operating System is Replaceable

Filed under
OS

So many people out there just love to talk about how Linux is now a "drop in replacement" for Microsoft Windows or Macintosh OSX. This isn't the case. The sad truth is that there are no "drop in replacements" for most software, and especially so for operating systems.

Let's look at Windows for a moment. There are two things that hold people to Windows like super glue. The first one is MS Office. We need to be realistic. OpenOffice.org is fantastic. It's my personal favorite as an office suite. It is NOT 100% compatible with MS Office, and that's just how it is.

Quite often, rulers are going to be off. Advanced formatting will always be skewed, and fonts are never accurate. Telling someone that they need to alter (potentially) thousands of documents to switch to a "free" software stack is effectively making the software stack anything but free.

rest here




More in Tux Machines

Ubuntu tablet and smartphone: a personal "mini" review

So when Ubuntu and Canonical revealed they were partnering with actual, big manufacturers for Ubuntu mobile devices, a spark of hope was rekindled in my heart. Let it be clear, I am by no means an Ubuntu user, not even a fan. I left the fold nearly a decade ago, after having spent quite some time using and contributing to Kubuntu (to the point of becoming a certified “member” even, though I never ascended to the Council). In terms of loyalties and usage, I am a KDE user (and “helper”) foremost. I use Fedora because it just works for me, for now. So, yes, an Ubuntu Touch device would be another compromise for me, but it would be the smallest one. Or so I hoped. Read more

today's leftovers

Phoronix on Graphics

Leftovers: Software