Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

After Google, Microsoft is RUMORED to have bought Opera!

Filed under
Microsoft

CoolTechZone.com, a tech magazine has this insider report claiming that the world’s largest software company Microsoft has acquired Opera Software. They also claim that both Google and Microsoft were bidding for this deal and in the end, Microsoft emerged the winner out of the two. The magazine also claims that the deal is almost through and both the companies are now talking about locations for the browser’s research and development centers throughout the world.

Full Story.

In other Google vs M$ news:

It's all over--including the shouting, swearing and chair-throwing. We'd call it a gentleman's agreement, but the preceding conduct was far from noble or squirely: Microsoft said late Thursday it had reached a settlement with rival Google and former employee Kai-Fu Lee, thus putting to bed a legal battle that had exposed behind-the-scenes ill-feeling between the companies.

Gates' Microsoft And Google Settle Employee Row .

Opera denies Microsoft take over

SantaSoft, I mean Microsoft isn't giving us an early Christmas gift after all, since Opera confirmed that the Microsoft purchase was in fact false.

"Our phones have been ringing off the hook," said a spokesman for Opera. "But it's not true. We have not been bought, and we have not received any offers. It's just a rumour, like the Google rumour last week."

Full Article.

----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?

I'd rather have coal

I cant' tell you how releaved I am that Opera wasn't purchased by Microsoft. I've been an Opera user for quite a while and would have been greatly displeased if Gates had gotten his hands on something that Microshaft would only then totally screwup.

*******
http://myfirstlinux.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Today in Techrights

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more