Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

MAKING YOUR KDE LOOK LIKE A MAC OS X

Filed under
HowTos

Many people are interested in getting their linux or BSD desktop interface to look as much like Apple's very successful OS X gui as possible. Now, I am well aware that many others are not thus enamored, and in fact profess a real dislike for the look. This article is NOT being written for the latter, and please if you don't like the OS X, don't write and/or comment and put it down. Just ignore this article. But for those of you who are interested in reproducing that look on your linux desktop, here is a step by step method for doing so on the KDE desktop environment. It is not definitive, nor the final word on the subject, but it will give you a pretty good start. Here are a couple of examples:

Full Story.

Yes and no

I really like the Baghira theme, however every time I try to use it, it starts eating system resources. Additionally, it seems Firefox doesn't like it of you use Baghira.

Any ideas?

*******
http://myfirstlinux.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

With government approval, OpenStack adoption continues apace in China

Deployments of OpenStack cloud are growing faster in China and the APAC region than anywhere else in the world, backed in part by the Chinese government's vocal support for the open source infrastructure. It is China in particular where some of the biggest deployments are running. China UnionPay recently overtook Visa for the largest volume of card payments in the world. The state-operated railway network China Rail oversees billions of passengers every year. By total number of subscribers China Mobile tops the list for biggest mobile phone operator globally. And the massive utility organisation the State Grid Corporation of China employs 1.5 million people. All of these enormous enterprises are running OpenStack clouds. Why? Read more Also:

The Fox Hunt - Firefox and friends compared

So what should you use? Well, it depends. You want extensions, the entire repertoire as it's meant to be? Go with Pale Moon, but be aware of the inconsistencies and problems down the road. However, another piece of penalty is less than optimal looks. If you are more focused on speed and future development, then it's Firefox, as it offers the most complete compromise. The add-ons will make it or break it. Waterfox makes less sense, because the margins of benefit are too small. My take is - Firefox. It's not ideal, but Pale Moon does not solve the problem fully, it combines nostalgia with technicals, and that's a rough patch, even though the project is quite admirable in what it's trying to do. Alas, I'm afraid the old extensions will die, and the new ones won't be compatible, so the browser will be left stranded somewhere in between. But hopefully, this little comparison test gives you a better overview and understanding how things work. Finally, we go back to the question of speed. We've seen how one flavor of Fox stacks against another, but what about Chrome? I will answer that in a follow-up article, which will compare Chrome to Vivaldi, again based on popular demand, and then we will also check how all these different browsers compare using my small, limited and entirely personal corner of the Web. Stay tuned. Read more Also: Firefox Private Browsing vs. Chrome Incognito: Which is Faster?

Tizen News

Android Leftovers