Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

The 10 Best Linux Distributions of 2009

Filed under
Linux

It was exactly one year ago today that I published my original "The 10 Best Linux Distributions" and it's time to put forth a new list for this year's best. Without looking at the old list, I've decided to compile this one from scratch. This 2009 list takes several factors into account for placement in the list: Community support, commercial support, software variety, update engine and distribution frequency. Even for old Linux salts, there are a few surprises on this list. For starters, Ubuntu is not number one.

1. gNewSense - Ever since my conversation with Richard Stallman, I've decided that gNewSense is the distro that claims the top spot for this year. Based on Ubuntu, which is based on Debian, gNewSense contains only free software. It's also the distro that Stallman himself uses--how can you beat that?

2. Debian - Debian is a GNU/Linux distribution that has it all: Great support, unsurpassed stability, awesome developers, a huge community, dozens of offspring including Ubuntu and gNewSense, regular updates, apt-get, thousands of ready-to-install programs and it makes a great user computer or server system. Debian also has the best hardware discovery of any distribution, which is probably why it's used to parent so many other distributions. If Debian has one weakness, it's commercial support. There's no Debian, Inc. for businesses to point to should something go awry. For businesses to adopt a particular distribution, it must have commercial support. For some, the risk is too great otherwise.

3. Ubuntu -

rest here




Top 10

I would not call that my top ten for 2009.

More like bottom 10

This is the worst list I have seen. Most of these are just the same thing. gNewSense and Debian/Ubuntu. Who cares what Stallman uses. That's the lamest reason I have read to use something. CentOS/Redhat; same thing. I'm a little fascinated with Presto after seeing a Youtube video of it, but i know that somehow, Xandros is going to mess it up. I didn't even know Gentoo was still alive, with all their in house bickering. So far, Fedora has been a pain with everyone that I know that uses it when 11 came out, after all, I read everywhere that 10 was solid. I was even considering to switch my work computer. I can't say anything about Knoppix but DSL, eventually it will disappear and everyone will move on to Tiny/Micro Core. Forums are excellent and so is everything on 10mb.

No mention of Arch, no even rock solid Slackware 13. I think Mint would have been the best choice for the Debs.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Today in Techrights

Fedora 26 Linux Might Ship with an LXQt Flavor, Won't Replace the LXDE Spin

There's a new self-contained change planned for the upcoming Fedora 26 Linux distribution, due for release on June 6, 2017, namely a new flavor built around the lightweight, Qt-based LXQt desktop environment. Read more

Devil-Linux 1.8.0 to Be a Major Overhaul, Will Use SquashFS as Main File System

It's been seven months since we last heard something from the developers of the Devil-Linux project, which produces a tiny, dedicated server distribution for many applications, and a new development version of the upcoming 1.8 stable series is out. Read more

CentOS vs Ubuntu: Which one is better for a server

Finally decided to get a VPS but can’t decide which Linux distro to use? We’ve all been there. The choice may even be overwhelming, even for Linux distros, considering all the different flavors and distros that are out there. Though, the two most widely used and most popular server distros are CentOS and Ubuntu. This is the main dilemma among admins, both beginners and professionals. Having experience with both (and more) distros, we decided to do a comparison of CentOS and Ubuntu when used for a server. Read more