Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

The Win, Fail and Meh of Open Source in 2008

Filed under
OSS

With 2008 coming to an end, heise online UK picks what was full of win, who was waiting for the failboat, and who just made us go meh. So in no particular order, here are the Wins, the Fails and the Mehs of Open Source from 2008.

Win - Ubuntu 8.04LTS - Canonical shipping a long term support version of Ubuntu was a real win for the FOSS operating system. It gave those users who need the assurance a version of Ubuntu to deploy that has support for longer than the normal 18 months. While there have been Linux distributions with similar offerings, they are usually associated with services or subscriptions. Ubuntu has brought that level of support to a free operating system. Ubuntu has also done more to popularise Linux in 2008 than possibly any other vendor, creating an enthusiastic, inclusive community, around a Linux distribution that sets out to be easy to work with for the general user, rather than just those with a corporate cheque book to hand.

Fail - SCO - A fail for SCO, a win for open source, as another year passed and SCO continued to excavate the hole they began digging when they tried to claim Unix as theirs and threatened Linux for patent violations. What's left is a company that doesn't even have friends with big cheque books any more.

Meh - Microsoft joining the Apache Foundation -

Rest Here




More in Tux Machines

Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd

The boycotting of systemd has led to the creation of uselessd, a new init daemon based off systemd that tries to strip out the "unnecessary" features. Uselessd in its early stages of development is systemd reduced to being a basic init daemon process with "the superfluous stuff cut out". Among the items removed are removing of journald, libudev, udevd, and superfluous unit types. Read more

Open source is not dead

I don’t think you can compare Red Hat to other Linux distributions because we are not a distribution company. We have a business model on Enterprise Linux. But I would compare the other distributions to Fedora because it’s a community-driven distribution. The commercially-driven distribution for Red Hat which is Enterprise Linux has paid staff behind it and unlike Microsoft we have a Security Response Team. So for example, even if we have the smallest security issue, we have a guaranteed resolution pattern which nobody else can give because everybody has volunteers, which is fine. I am not saying that the volunteers are not good people, they are often the best people in the industry but they have no hard commitments to fixing certain things within certain timeframes. They will fix it when they can. Most of those people are committed and will immediately get onto it. But as a company that uses open source you have no guarantee about the resolution time. So in terms of this, it is much better using Red Hat in that sense. It’s really what our business model is designed around; to give securities and certainties to the customers who want to use open source. Read more

10 Reasons to use open source software defined networking

Software-defined networking (SDN) is emerging as one of the fastest growing segments of open source software (OSS), which in itself is now firmly entrenched in the enterprise IT world. SDN simplifies IT network configuration and management by decoupling control from the physical network infrastructure. Read more

Only FOSSers ‘Get’ FOSS

Back on the first of September I wrote an article about Android, in which I pointed out that Google’s mobile operating system seems to be primarily designed to help sell things. This eventually led to a discussion thread on a subreddit devoted to Android. Needless to say, the fanbois and fangrrls over on Reddit didn’t cotton to my criticism and they devoted a lot of space complaining about how the article was poorly written. Read more