Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Symantec report sparks safe-browser debate

Filed under
OSS

In its latest Internet Security Threat Report, released yesterday, security vendor Symantec Corp. noted that in the first six months of 2005, the open-source Firefox Web browser had more confirmed vulnerabilities than Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer browser.

So does that mean that the Mozilla-based browser is less secure than proponents have said and that Internet Explorer is more secure than believed?

Not exactly, according to security experts.

But that's not the whole story, said Vincent Weafer, senior director of Symantec's Security Response Team.

"Vendors tend to report vulnerabilities differently," said Mike Schroepfer, director of engineering for the Mozilla open-source project. Microsoft tends to group several confirmed vulnerabilities together in one announcement and patch, whereas Mozilla announces each confirmed vulnerability individually. That skews the number of confirmed vulnerabilities.

Other security monitoring companies, such as Secunia in Copenhagen, show different results than Symantec. We still believe Firefox is the safest browser around.

Full Story.

More in Tux Machines

Google Fixed GHOST Exploit in Chrome OS in 2014 and Didn't Tell Anyone

Details about a GLIBC vulnerability were published a couple of days ago by a company called Qualys, and the distributions using it have already received patches. Now, it seems that Google knew about this problem, patched it in ChromeOS a year ago, and forgot to say anything to anyone. Read more

ESA implements open source based private cloud infrastructure

The European Space Agency (ESA) has implemented a private cloud infrastructure to offer IT services to its user communities. The datacentre in Frascati, Italy, is already operational, while a second datacentre in Darmstadt, Germany, has just been completed. Read more

Today in Techrights

A small note on window decorations

If you have updated to the recently released GNOME development version, you may have noticed that some window decorations look slightly different. Of course it is quite normal for the theme to evolve with the rest of GNOME, but in this case the visual changes are actually the result of some bigger changes under the hood which deserve some more explanation. It is well-known that GTK+ gained support for client-side decorations a while ago – after all, most GNOME applications were quick in adopting custom titlebars, which have become one of the most distinguished patterns of GNOME 3 applications. However it is less well-known that client-side decorations may also be used for windows with no custom decorations, namely when using GDK’s wayland backend. Read more