Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Why is the choice of distribution so important and contentious?

I was just going to leave it at the question but, like an old washer woman, I just can't help yakking on...

Is a distro a distro a distro? Why would anyone care? I'm a distribution slut, quite happy to run any distribution that allows me to install and run my programs in the quickest and easiest possible way. I don't have the time to build everything from source on each kernel update. I need Linux, I don't really need a distribution but it just so happens that a distribution is the most convenient method of getting Linux installed without too much farting around. Once installed what do I run? Linux? No, on it's own Linux is just a platform for me to run the things that make me productive. Linux on it's own is, well, pants in terms of usefulness pertaining to my work.

MS and Apple don't sell their respective OS's because they run system operations, they sell a platform on which to run the things you need. If I install Ms/PC Dos what can I do with it. Run DIR a few times? Copy files? Send some text to a file on copy con? Delete a file? Ok, done all that, now what? Aha, I have to INSTALL some programs... Although lately the marketing has shifted to showing your apps running in nice, foil wrapped eye candy. Even the eye candy would be pretty useless without the apps to show running in it.

It is the applications available that make the operating system popular and not the operating system itself. So perhaps more attention should be given to the applications we have available in Linux and getting more apps ported from the other platforms. Taking the cream of the crop and making them better when running in whatever distribution tickles your fancy. Windows is still prolific because of the massive number of corporate installs and the huge slice of gaming home users. Port those games to Linux. Mr (or Mrs or Ms or Miss) average user couldn't give a toss if it's Linux, Windows or the fruity one (Linux will take precedent as it is cost free and the average user would give you the Homer Simpson "Huh?" look if you even whisper the word(s) OpenSource).

Well these are the apps that I spend most of my time in:

Oracle SQLDeveloper
Aqua DataStudio
Eclipse (J2EE with OC4J, perl, php, webdev, Java, Tcl)
MySQL Query/Admin
Gambas2 (occaisionally, quick prototyping)
Open Office
Anjuta (c++, c)
Glade Interface Designer
Amarok (on gnome but who cares, I happen to like gnome and amarok)
Evolution (works for me, rsync to keep all computers up to date)
neverball/put (good fun with my macbook motion sensor)
warzone 2100

plus the plethora of CLI tools, vi is my friend. He's an apt get that one!

All of these applications are installed regardless of Distribution and who keeps the default distro install setup anyway? As soon as I get one installed I make it look exactly like the other I have on my Vaio or Pavilion. The distribution differences seem to be wallpaper, colours, some graphics, usplash and fonts with a few apps thrown in so you can actually use it for something. No matter which distribution gets installed by the time I've added all the applications that I run, hung up my posters, made it look comfy and put my feet up on the shell coffee table I have effectively the same distribution as any other (barring one or two nice distro specific config apps that on the whole I would rarely use once everything is up and running).

So, asking again, why should I care about the distribution I run when, whichever one I choose to try, is customised to look like the previous? Or, am I really missing something here? Why is it that people are so passionate over their favourite?

Anyway I read Linux Format and built my own that installs all the above apps by default, sets the wallpaper and moves in the rest of my furniture and the dog too. Hopefully I won't have to create another for a while if I keep the kernel up to date. I'll keep up with the review reading though to find some useful utils, config apps etc. It would be helpful if reviews just mentioned what was useful instead of whining on about how the default colour scheme resembles a Martian struggling with a bad case of constipation.

As for the DW's (Distribution Whinger's), the old joke goes:

A man visits the doctors, waves his arm around and says, "Doc, it hurts when I do this".
The doctor looks up from his scribbles and replies, "Well don't do that then".

If you don't like the distribution you've installed then run another one or change it into something that you do like. Any colour so long as it is black?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Passionate, sure... but contentious?

To me, the difference between distributions seems vast. I suspect that's because I'm not as proficient as you are, and because I'm actively interested in the education of new users. If you know enough, any well-crafted distro can be made to do anything that any other Linux distro can be made to do, but it's the challenge of confronting the user's limitations that distinguish them.

My favorite Linux distro is Debian. There are practical reasons, sentimental reasons, and political-social reasons. I'm enough of an admirer of Richard Stallman that it matters to me that Debian actually puts "GNU/Linux" right there in the official name.

I have a love-hate relationship with Ubuntu. I never expected that a Debian-based distro would be the one to really break into the mainstream, and I love that, but I think it's designed with Windows users in mind, leaving a Linux user like me to flounder a bit. Ubuntu isn't a fad. If you care about FOSS, Ubuntu is important. I'm not a developer, but I've started to use Ubuntu on one of my machines, and I'm going to see what I can do to act on my misgivings. I want Ubuntu to succeeed.

Other distros that I love are Kanotix--a great live CD, similar to Knoppix, but hacked for a good stable hard drive install, Opensuse with its (slow but ) comprehensive and reliable administration tool, YAST, and Vector, a beautiful and user-friendly repackaging of Slackware, incredibly responsive on older machines.

And then there's Slackware itself. I can't get slackware to run all of the software I like, but there's something about its utter simplicity that lends itself to getting work done. It could be all in my mind. Hell, it's obviously all in my mind, but Slackware just seems to have an energizing vibe. Things get done.

To love a distro is like loving a particular make of car. It adds to the fun, and while there's a little friendly rivalry sometimes, when wqas the last time you heard of a Ford Person and a Chevy person coming to blows over such things?

More in Tux Machines

Booting Linux In Just One Second

One of the most interesting presentations from this year's Embedded Linux Conference Europe was how-to boot Linux in under one second! For targeting various embedded use-cases, Jan Altenberg of Linutronix presented how to achieve this feat of booting Linux in under one second. Read more

Twitter Clients

  • Best in Breed Twitter Clients for Linux
    Twitter is a social networking service that is a bit of a conundrum to many. At any given time it can be used to connect with people of a like mind, and at another it’s an exercise in frustration, thanks to the never-ending stream of data. But for those that depend upon the service as a means to either stay connected, promote a product or service, or even (on certain levels) research a given topic, it’s a boon.
  • Pick of the Bunch: Command line Twitter Clients
    A console application is computer software which is able to be used via a text-only computer interface, the command line interface, or a text-based interface included within a graphical user interface operating system, such as a terminal emulator (such as GNOME Terminal or Terminator). Whereas a graphical user interface application generally involves using the mouse and keyboard (or touch control), with a console application the primary (and often only) input method is the keyboard.
  • db2twitter: Twitter out of the browser
    You have a database, a tweet pattern and wants to automatically tweet on a regular basis? No need for RSS, fancy tricks, 3rd party website to translate RSS to Twitter or whatever. Just use db2twitter.

FOSS/Linux Events

  • The Linux Foundation Becomes Steward of the Open Networking Summit
    If you're able to get to the Silicon Valley area in March, there is a big open networking conference taking shape, with some very talented participants. The Linux Foundation is announcing that the Open Networking Summit (ONS) is becoming a Linux Foundation event, and ONS 2016 will take place March 14-17, 2016 in Santa Clara, Calif.
  • Visualize astrophysics data with Blender
    The Blender Conference has become a fantastic showcase not just of attractive art and animation, but also unconventional uses of Blender and open source software.
  • SDN/NFV DevRoom at FOSDEM: Deadline approaching!
    We extended the deadline for the SDN/NFV DevRoom at FOSDEM to Wednesday, November 25th recently – and we now have the makings of a great line-up!

today's howtos