Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Open source buyers less price conscious

Filed under
OSS

Enterprises rank price and total cost of ownership as a low priority when they choose between an open source and proprietary software solution, according to a new survey from Evans Data.

Depending on the business segment, performance, product maturity, features and developer community were the key drivers for organisation to choose an open source product.

Large enterprises often use open source software as a way to standardise on a single platform that's based on open standards. Small and medium sized organisations more often than their large counterparts specifically ask for an open source solution because it is perceived to be more flexible, the Evans Data study said.

The outcome of the survey is noteworthy because discussions about the differences between the Linux and Windows operating systems often revolve around the cost of each solution.

While Linux is available free of charge, some studies have suggested that the total cost of ownership for the operating system is higher than Windows because of additional maintenance cost.

"While cost wasn't a primary motivator to adoption, cost was also considered something that [firms] were willing to pay for in the form of services and support," John Andrews, Chief Operating Officer with Evans Data, told vnunet.com.

Evans Data surveyed about 500 enterprise IT managers and conducted in depth interviews with 40 organizations for the study.

By Tom Sanders
vnunet.com

More in Tux Machines

Kernel Space/Linux

Red Hat News

openSUSE Tumbleweed: A Linux distribution on the leading edge

So, to summarize: openSUSE Tumbleweed is a good, solid, stable Linux distribution with a wide range of desktops available. It is not anything particularly exotic or unstable, and it does not require an unusual amount of Linux expertise to install and use on an everyday system. To make a very simple comparison, in my experience installing and using Tumbleweed is much less difficult and much less risky than using the Debian "testing" distribution, and it is kept much (much much) more up to date than openSUSE Leap, Debian "stable", Linux Mint or Ubuntu. I don't say that to demean any of those other distributions. As I said at the end of my recent post about point-release vs. rolling-release distributions, if your hardware is fully supported by one of those point-release distributions, and you are satisfied with the applications included in them, then they are certainly a good choice. But if you like staying on the leading edge, or if you have very new hardware which requires the latest Linux kernel and drivers, or you just want/need the latest version of some application (in my case this would be digiKam), then openSuSE could be just what you want. Read more Also: Google Summer of Code 2017

Graphics in Linux

  • 17 Fresh AMDGPU DC Patches Posted Today
    Seventeen more "DC" display code patches were published today for the AMDGPU DRM driver, but it's still not clear if it will be ready -- or accepted -- for Linux 4.12. AMD developers posted 17 new DC (formerly known as DAL) patches today to provide small fixes for Vega10/GFX9 hardware, various internal code changes, CP2520 DisplayPort compliance, and various small fixes.
  • libinput 1.7.0
  • Libinput 1.7 Released With Support For Lid Switches, Scroll Wheel Improvements
    Peter Hutterer has announced the new release of libinput 1.7.0 as the input handling library most commonly associated with Wayland systems but also with Ubuntu's Mir as well as the X.Org Server via the xf86-input-libinput driver.
  • Nouveau TGSI Shader Cache Enabled In Mesa 17.1 Git
    Building off the work laid by Timothy Arceri and others for enabling a TGSI (and hardware) shader cache in the RadeonSI Gallium3D driver as well as R600g TGSI shader cache due ot the common infrastructure work, the Nouveau driver is now leveraging it to enable the TGSI shader cache for Nouveau Gallium3D drivers.