Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Open source buyers less price conscious

Filed under
OSS

Enterprises rank price and total cost of ownership as a low priority when they choose between an open source and proprietary software solution, according to a new survey from Evans Data.

Depending on the business segment, performance, product maturity, features and developer community were the key drivers for organisation to choose an open source product.

Large enterprises often use open source software as a way to standardise on a single platform that's based on open standards. Small and medium sized organisations more often than their large counterparts specifically ask for an open source solution because it is perceived to be more flexible, the Evans Data study said.

The outcome of the survey is noteworthy because discussions about the differences between the Linux and Windows operating systems often revolve around the cost of each solution.

While Linux is available free of charge, some studies have suggested that the total cost of ownership for the operating system is higher than Windows because of additional maintenance cost.

"While cost wasn't a primary motivator to adoption, cost was also considered something that [firms] were willing to pay for in the form of services and support," John Andrews, Chief Operating Officer with Evans Data, told vnunet.com.

Evans Data surveyed about 500 enterprise IT managers and conducted in depth interviews with 40 organizations for the study.

By Tom Sanders
vnunet.com

More in Tux Machines

Linux Gaming For Older/Lower-End Graphics Cards In 2018

A request came in this week to look at how low-end and older graphics cards are performing with current generation Linux games on OpenGL and Vulkan. With ten older/lower-end NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon graphics cards, here is a look at their performance with a variety of native Linux games atop Ubuntu using the latest Radeon and NVIDIA drivers. Read more Also: Wine 3.0 open-source compatibility layer now available

Red Hat Patch Warning

  • We Didn't Pull CPU Microcode Update to Pass the Buck
  • Red Hat Will Revert Spectre Patches After Receiving Reports of Boot Issues
    Red Hat is releasing updates that are reverting previous patches for the Spectre vulnerability (Variant 2, aka CVE-2017-5715) after customers complained that some systems were failing to boot. "Red Hat is no longer providing microcode to address Spectre, variant 2, due to instabilities introduced that are causing customer systems to not boot," the company said yesterday. "The latest microcode_ctl and linux-firmware packages are reverting these unstable microprocessor firmware changes to versions that were known to be stable and well tested, released prior to the Spectre/Meltdown embargo lift date on Jan 3rd," Red Had added.

Android Leftovers

Security: Updates, SOS Fund, IR, ME, and WPA

  • Security updates for Friday
  • Seeking SOS Fund Projects
    I’m spending some time over the next few days looking for the next round of projects which might benefit from an SOS Fund security audit.
  • Strong Incident Response Starts with Careful Preparation
    Through working every day with organizations’ incident response (IR) teams, I am confronted with the entire spectrum of operational maturity. However, even in the companies with robust IR functions, the rapidly evolving threat landscape, constantly changing best practices, and surplus of available tools make it easy to overlook important steps during planning. As a result, by the time an incident occurs, it’s too late to improve their foundational procedures.
  • The Intel Management Engine: an attack on computer users' freedom
    Over time, Intel imposed the Management Engine on all Intel computers, removed the ability for computer users and manufacturers to disable it, and extended its control over the computer to nearly 100%. It even has access to the main computer's memory.
  • What Is WPA3, and When Will I Get It On My Wi-Fi?
    WPA2 is a security standard that governs what happens when you connect to a closed Wi-Fi network using a password. WPA2 defines the protocol a router and Wi-Fi client devices use to perform the “handshake” that allows them to securely connect and how they communicate. Unlike the original WPA standard, WPA2 requires implementation of strong AES encryption that is much more difficult to crack. This encryption ensures that a Wi-Fi access point (like a router) and a Wi-Fi client (like a laptop or phone) can communicate wirelessly without their traffic being snooped on.