Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Windows vs Linux security report card redux

Filed under
Security

Jeff Jones has expanded his project to count security flaws (publicly reported and fixed) in the major workstation operating systems and his latest numbers show Windows Vista has by far the best security profile when compared to the major Linux distributions.

eff Jones, security strategy director in Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing group, led a TechEd 2007 discussion on the metrics and techniques used to keep track of vulnerabilities and offered a glimpse at his upcoming report card that compares flaws found/fixed during Vista’s first six months on the market against Windows XP, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 WS (full), Ubuntu 6.06 LTS (full), Novell SUSE Linux Enteprise Desktop 10 (full) and Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger).

Full Post.



The Master of All FUDMeisters

This series of 'studies' gets smashed to pieces time after time and time (see comments in the article for example), but it doesn't stop Microsoft from publishing false figures (READ: lies) and sticking them in pamphlets. Some industry supervision ought to step in and handle this case of misleading benchmarks. They got caught before (e.g. cheating in IBM benchmarks in the most ridiculous of ways. They more recently did this to Novell).

Oh look, another "study"...*yawn*

*Switches to salesman voice*

Do you have a problem with a competitor?

Are you having a difficult time keeping up with them?

Well, don't worry! If you can't compete fairly, attack them publically!

With the new FUDMASTER-2000!

Order yours now, and we'll throw in a free DVD tutorial!

In the DVD, get great hints and tips to FUD your competitors! They won't know what hit them!

If you call in the next 10 minutes, we'll throw in a complementary "throwing chair"! Its a great stress reliever when your competitor annoys you! This is the same one used and certified by Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer!

Only 12 easy payments of US$29.95!

Act now!

*Switches OFF salesman voice*

Seriously though, we've been here before.

A Microsoft rep or a paid third-party presents a study which favours them.

They're done it with:

(1) "Get the Facts" website. (LOTS there!)

(2) Bill Hilf (Head of MS's Linux Lab) did it in an attempt to show Linux uses just as much as hardware resources as Windows...This failed miserably when you realise the system you need to run Vista (with all the eyecandy) smoothly.

(3) Attack GPL v3!
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070522-microsoft-funds-questionable-study-attacking-gpl-3-draft-process.html

(4) And now this!

The fact is, such studies don't work on us. And how we beat them is to question and explain to others why one should be very skeptical. Any opensource geek knows charts and statistics can be manipulated to favour anyone. All one needs to do is select the right influencing factors to affect the result.

To be honest, you should ignore it. (like the other ones that fade into memory).

Come to think of it, we should file every study MS conducts or pays to be conducted in an archive.

Better yet, we should start a website that collects all MS's propaganda and document the tricks they do! It'll help MS's future competitors! (Gives them a clear view of what to expect!)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More in Tux Machines

Some FreeBSD Users Are Still Running Into Random Lock-Ups With Ryzen

While Linux has been playing happily with Ryzen CPUs as long as you weren't affected by the performance marginality problem where you had to swap out for a newer CPU (and Threadripper and EPYC CPUs have been running splendid in all of my testing with not having any worries), it seems the BSDs (at least FreeBSD) are still having some quirks to address. This week on the FreeBSD mailing list has been another thread about Ryzen issues on FreeBSD. Some users are still encountering random lockups that do not correspond to any apparent load/activity on the system. Read more

PC desktop build, Intel, spectre issues etc.

Apart from the initial system bought, most of my systems when being changed were in the INR 20-25k/- budget including all and any accessories I bought later. The only real expensive parts I purchased have been external hdd ( 1 TB WD passport) and then a Viewsonic 17″ LCD which together sent me back by around INR 10k/- but both seem to give me adequate performance (both have outlived the warranty years) with the monitor being used almost 24×7 over 6 years or so, of course over GNU/Linux specifically Debian. Both have been extremely well value for the money. As I had been exposed to both the motherboards I had been following those and other motherboards as well. What was and has been interesting to observe what Asus did later was to focus more on the high-end gaming market while Gigabyte continued to dilute it energy both in the mid and high-end motherboards. Read more

Intel OpenGL vs. Vulkan Performance With Mesa 18.0

Given the very strong Vulkan vs. OpenGL performance in the recent low-end/older Linux gaming GPU tests with discrete graphics cards, I was curious to run some benchmarks seeing the current state of Intel's open-source OpenGL vs. Vulkan performance. With the Mesa 18.0 release to be branched soon, it was a good time seeing how the Intel i965 OpenGL and ANV Vulkan drivers compare. Read more

How To Install Themes Or Icons In Elementary OS

After installing Elementary OS, you may feel that you want to customize it to look more than Out-of-the-box system, and more of a personalized Operating system per se. It's very easy to install themes and icons for your Elementary OS. The process is pretty much the same as installing icons and themes in any ubuntu system since it is built upon Ubuntu. Read
more