Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Early 2007 Fav Distro

*ubuntu
26% (1436 votes)
openSUSE
15% (812 votes)
PCLOS
25% (1396 votes)
Mandriva
7% (403 votes)
Gentoo
5% (277 votes)
Slackware
4% (196 votes)
Debian
6% (331 votes)
Fedora/RH
4% (228 votes)
*BSD
1% (80 votes)
Other
6% (340 votes)
Total votes: 5499

Sceptical of the lot so far

I've tried 7 or 8. PCLOS is in front and there's daylight after the runner-up.

I think another poster hit the nail on the head. The major problem is that programmers and developers have too much say when we need leadership that says "Why not?" instead of why not. The trouble with "software for humanity" is that the leader says "Why not?" and the developers/programmers don't seem to know how.

I'm currently downloading KateOS which impresses me with the amount of information it makes available about package content and the fact that it has an update-OS tool. Lunar Linux also provides an impressive amount of information.

Debian Etch

Etch is my favorite. It is stable and very fast. Booting on my amd64 machine, from GRUB to the KDE login menu, takes 20 seconds. Installation is simple and easy now. And because it's Debian, there are more than 15,000 software packages in the Debian repositories. Those of us in the Linux, free software community enjoy many fine distributions and IMHO, Etch is one of the very best.

re: Debian Etch

I'm seriously considering switching my server over to Debian.

re: Etch

srlinuxx wrote:
I'm seriously considering switching my server over to Debian.

I agree with vonskippy's comment--CentOS or Debian on the server. I've pretty much settled on PCLOS on the Desktop, but I will be taking a long look at both Debian and CentOS this coming Summer when I have the time. I'm leaning toward Debian, but since CentOS is based on RHL, it's got to be solid as a server--after all, server land is Red Hat's Bread & Butter. Also, Red Hat's extensive documentation is a factor.

There are many who claim to use Gentoo effectively in server roles, but I think they are mainly full time tech industry folk. For those who maintain servers in their spare time, CentOS and Debian have to be easier work with.

Experimenting with one of the BSD flavors has always been a vague and distant ambition of mine, but I've never quite found the time or inclination to actually pursue it.

For me, anything with the letters SUSE in it is beyond consideration.

re: Debian

Rock stable, great net install, and you gotta love APT.

But the never ending release date mess, the dunc-tank debacle, developer bickering (and whining about how Ubuntu is stealing their thunder), the whole Ice Weasle hoo-ha, and the fact that support is available only from it's shall we say "wacky" community (i.e. no corp. sponsor), makes Debian hard to love, and certainly does a good job at scaring the suits (i.e. people who make the money decisions) away from warming up to it.

re: Debian

Quote:

Rock stable, great net install, and you gotta love APT.

I'm really wanting a binary distro I think. I'm getting a bit burnt out with all the gentoo hassles on the server. I can deal with wonky portage problems on the desktop, but I don't need broken stuff on the server.

I setup Debian last year when I was trying out some off-site hosts, and it seemed fairly simple and straight forward. I guess that's why I was leaning towards it.

A *bsd would require lots of new learning. Big Grin

re: Debian

CentOS and Debian would be on my short list for a good LAMP server distro. Both have good track records of security and stability. Both have a sufficient choice of server type packages (although CentOS is more like Sarge then Etch when it comes to package versions).

Since I'm guessing you don't have to worry about the politics of your choice, it pretty much boils down to your preference of APT vs YUM and rc.d vs service.

Source distro's seemed to make a lot more sense back in the days of mediocre hardware, but now you can (cheaply) just throw more clock cycles at it to overcome most binary vs custom compiled speed advantages.

Even for a quick study, I think the "time to learn/master/be comfortable" cost for *bsd would be higher then the payoff (especially for something as basic as a LAMP server).

I'm not sure where I'm going yet

I was a very happy Kanotix user until its lead developer, Kano, suddenly decided that basing a distro on Debian Unstable wasn't worth the effort. (Someone also said he wasn't able to support himself doing it like he wanted to.)

Within days, Kanotix's co-developer, SLH, and many of the other former Kanotix devs announced a new distro named Sidux, also based on Debian Unstable (Sid).

This was good because it allowed an easy upgrade path from Kanotix.

On the other hand, I don't particularly like a couple of Sidux's founders, and at this point it feels more like joining a religion than using an operating system.

I really like Debian's package management system, and the more you use it, the more you understand how it works. I'm not terribly interested in using a Debian derivative like *buntu, so I may just end up installing stock Debian Testing.

Distro hopping and evaluation

You've got to try different distros at times--even if it only reaffirms your current choice. But, installing and configuring trial distros can eat up enormous amounts of time. It's why I got involved here at Tuxmachines to start with--I needed to know what distros were worth trying. Of course, Tuxmachines has become a good Linux/OSS news/discussion site as well.

When you hit that sweet spot with a distro, and get your box(es) highly tuned with it, you then encounter those periods with maximum productivity (and entertainment). But software and hardware progress (except for the glaring exception of Vista), and things change. New wants and needs surface. And, sometimes, you try a different distro just for the adventure.

Eye candy is important. Good fonts, backgrounds, images and visual effects make the machine easier and more pleasurable to use, and result in better productivity. People have asked me, "How can you use Windows at work all day, and then, when you get home, the first thing you do is get on your computers at home?" The simple fact is that I use Linux exclusively at home, and I get a genuine sense of pleasure when I sit down to use my Linux machines. They look better, function better, and contribute toward my getting more work done.

Red Hat and Fedora works best for me.

My distro of choice has always been Redhat/Fedora. I use RHEL/CentOS/Fedora on almost all my server projects (mainly cluster farms doing molecular topography rendering). I never saw the advantage of distro-hopping, thinking it's better to dig in and master one, then hop around and be mediocre at many.

Until recently, never really worried about desktop linux - always used (gasp!) windows. As a business, the price of licensing is not even a blip on the spreadsheet when compared to interoperability between vendors and clients, application availability, and user learning curve costs. Now with Vista (what a major piece of suck that OS is) we're looking down the road to what our long term options are.

Unfortunately, Fedora has a lot of weak spots when it comes to the desktop. I tried PCLinuxOS, but they're pretty serious about being a desktop only distro, and since we do dev work on our desktops, they had way to much desktop-only inertia to overcome. I tried OpenSUSE, but wow, that was soooooo different from how RedHat/Fedora works, and I just couldn't learn to love YAST. Ubuntu always just rubbed me the wrong way with their "you're too stupid to trust with root" mentality.

So I'm either stuck with FC6, while waiting for FC7 to be released (end of April), or..... I might be learning to love Linux Mint. Like PCLinuxOS, it's a boutique distro with some very nice eye candy, multimedia ready out of the box, and a nice menu and control panel (wireless wth wpa-psk is even pretty painless to get working). Unlike PCLinuxOS it's fully capable of doing dev work on, or even running server apps using the vast library of Ubuntu applications and support. It still has that major sucky "no root" thing going on, but it's easy enough to setup a real root account so it's a minor whine.

So although I've always been a die hard RedHat/Fedora fan, and never into Distro hopping, I think I'll be taking FC6 off my laptop and replacing it with Linux Mint v2.2beta014. I haven't gone completely mental (at least not today) as I have no plans to dumping RHEL/CentOS from out server farms in favor of Debian/Ubuntu/Minty/Whatever.

My choice's Mandriva...

I've tried so many distros that i cannot even remember them Smile But every time i returned to my first love, Mandriva. I don't know why... Maybe it's because i've been using this distro since version 7.3, because i find it the easiest to use, because the Mandriva Linux community from Romania is really active and can provide answer to many questions, because i'm used to rpm/urpmi package management... Mandriva has lost the first place it had some years ago, and it seems like it is in great financial trouble, but it still is my choice. And will allways be, i guess. I'm waiting for PCLinuxOS 2007 final to see if it can change my opinion... But it's unlikely.

re: My choice's Mandriva...

Yeah, they're a sentimental favorite here too. They were the ones who rescued me from the evil empire, at version 7.2. I had a coupla near misses with 7.0 and 7.1, but 7.2 did it. I was hooked. I stuck with them until switching to Gentoo in Nov of 2003. I've been using that as my main desktop ever since. Portage used to work like clockwork, but it's becoming more and more buggy the last year or so. I'm not thinking of switching or anything, but the honeymoon is definitely over. Big Grin

I've been enjoying the testing releases of PCLOS 2007 on my laptop since they've been available. I ran openSUSE on it for a while, but never could get the fonts to purty up. Fonts look so gorgeous in PCLOS.

Tried many, ended up with Slackware

Prior to Slackware, I tried many distros but could not find any that did it all (at least for my wants). All I really need is desktop system that runs Kino (new baby = much raw dv), MPlayer and plugin for video, samba for printer and file sharing, and most any basic home applications. I also run a development server with php/mysql that I turn on when needed.

Tried PcLos once and thought I finally found the one, but after some use it seemed somewhat bloated. Tried MiniMe, but on building my system, I found that got somewhat buggy -- my guess it didn't handle dependencies correctly.

Then despite a frustrating experience with Slack in my early Linux days, I thought I'd give it another try. Turned out great. A bit time-consuming in the initial configuration that included compiling a 2.6 kernel. Ever since I got my system built, it's run like a dream -- never buggy, always fast and just as rock solid as its reputation. Basically a machine that I don't have to screw around until the next release, and if that release doesn't have any "gotta haves", I probably won't even worry about that.

As long as it's Linux

I prefer to consider this the fun part on the distro war ... a conflict that will eventually put Linux where Microsoft is.

As for my personal preference, I got happily stuck with PCLinuxOS after years of trying out (and still is) most of the Linux distros that are released. And now that PCLinuxOS 2007 Final is just around the bend, I hope it can give Ubuntu a run for its money.

Registered Linux User No. 401868

My favorite distribution for 2007

I used to use SuSE, Mandriva and Ubuntu in 2004/2005 but in 2006, I discovered ArchLinux. I'm still using it now in 2007 and I haven't looked back. My only regret is that I didn't discover this excellent distribution earlier. Smile

There's no real contest in my book

I've just installed Vector 5.8 and I have good memories of Zenwalk but PCLOS still wins. Now that I've dropped the nVidia driver, everything is looking good and proportional again. It's nice to be back.

More in Tux Machines

Red Hat Financial News

  • Red Hat announces latest version of Ansible
  • Red Hat On An Expansion Spree In India
    Red Hat is aggressively expanding its operations in India. The company recently announced the opening of two new offices in Bangalore and New Delhi. With the opening of the new offices, Red Hat is expanding its footprint in India with a goal of supporting interest for open source solutions and services from customers and partners and further promoting the benefits open source solutions can offer enterprises in India. Red Hat now has six offices in India, including additional facilities in Bangalore and New Delhi, and offices in Mumbai and Pune. Red Hat’s new Bangalore office is a 14,000 sq. ft. facility at Lavelle Road. It is designed to act as a training and enablement center for customers and partners. Through the new facility, which features a cafeteria, and space for networking, meetings, training and certification exams, and an indoor game zone, Red Hat aims to bring its open, collaborative culture to life. The additional New Delhi office is a 12,405 sq.ft facility located close to the international airport at Aerocity, designed with an eye toward enabling collaboration with customers throughout the region.
  • Somewhat Positive Press Coverage Very Likely to Affect Red Hat (RHT) Stock Price
  • Red Hat Inc (RHT) Releases Q1 Earnings Guidance

Security Leftovers

  • Security updates for Monday
  • Recursive DNS Server Fingerprint Problem

    Our goal is to identify hijacked resolvers by analyzing their fingerprints, in order to increase safety of Internet users. To do that, we utilize data collected via RIPE Atlas (atlas.ripe.net).

  • Online developer tutorials are spreading XSS and SQL injection flaws

    The researchers, from across three universities in Germany and Trend Micro, checked the PHP code bases of more than 64,000 projects on Github and uncovered more than 100 vulnerabilities that they believe might have been introduced as a result of developers picking up the code that they used from online tutorials.

  • BrickerBot, the permanent denial-of-service botnet, is back with a vengeance

    BrickerBot, the botnet that permanently incapacitates poorly secured Internet of Things devices before they can be conscripted into Internet-crippling denial-of-service armies, is back with a new squadron of foot soldiers armed with a meaner arsenal of weapons.

  • Reproducible Builds: week 104 in Stretch cycle
  • Webroot antivirus goes bananas, starts trashing Windows system files
    Webroot's security tools went berserk today, mislabeling key Microsoft Windows system files as malicious and temporarily removing them – knackering PCs in the process. Not only were people's individual copies of the antivirus suite going haywire, but also business editions and installations run by managed service providers (MSPs), meaning companies and organizations relying on the software were hit by the cockup. Between 1200 and 1500 MST (1800 and 2100 UTC) today, Webroot's gear labeled Windows operating system data as W32.Trojan.Gen – generic-Trojan-infected files, in other words – and moved them into quarantine, rendering affected computers unstable. Files digitally signed by Microsoft were whisked away – but, luckily, not all of them, leaving enough of the OS behind to reboot and restore the quarantined resources.
  • How The Update Framework Improves Security of Software Updates
    Updating software is one of the most important ways to keep users and organizations secure. But how can software be updated securely? That's the challenge that The Update Framework (TUF) aims to solve. Justin Cappos, assistant professor at New York University, detailed how TUF works and what's coming to further improve the secure updating approach in a session at last week's DockerCon 17 conference in Austin, Texas. Simply using HTTPS and Transport Layer Security (TLS) to secure a download isn't enough as there have been many publicly reported instances of software repositories that have been tampered with, Cappos said.
  • Security Updates for Ubuntu Phone to End in June
    Security updates for Ubuntu phone and tablet will end this June, Canonical has confirmed. Current OTA updates are currently limited to critical fixes and security updates — a decision we were first to tell you back in January. But after June 2017 Canonical “will no longer deliver any further updates”.
  • Canonical to stop supporting Ubuntu Phone in June
    Canonical had already announced development of its Ubuntu Phone software was ending. Now we know when the final nail goes in the coffin: June.
  • Malware Hunts And Kills Poorly Secured Internet Of Things Devices Before They Can Be Integrated Into Botnets
    Researchers say they've discovered a new wave of malware with one purpose: to disable poorly secured routers and internet of things devices before they can be compromised and integrated into botnets. We've often noted how internet-of-broken-things devices ("smart" doorbells, fridges, video cameras, etc.) have such flimsy security that they're often hacked and integrated into botnets in just a matter of seconds after being connected to the internet. These devices are then quickly integrated into botnets that have been responsible for some of the worst DDoS attacks we've ever seen (including last October's attack on DYN).

GNOME/GTK News

  • The Way GNOME Handles Wallpapers Really Annoys Me
    I love GNOME Shell — and no, not just because I’ve little choice now that is Ubuntu’s default desktop! But the more I use GNOME the more I learn that the desktop environment, like every other, has its own share of quirks, bugs and inconsistencies. Like the following appreciably niche niggle in the the way GNOME handles desktop wallpapers.
  • Drag-and-drop in lists
    I’ve recently had an occasion to implement reordering of a GtkListBox via drag-and-drop (DND). It was not that complicated. Since I haven’t seen drag-and-drop used much with list boxes, here is a quick summary of what is needed to get the basics working.

Containers News

  • How Kubernetes is making contributing easy
    As the program manager of the Kubernetes community at Google, Sarah Novotny has years of experience in open source communities including MySQL and NGINX. Sarah sat down with me at CloudNativeCon in Berlin at the end of March to discuss both the Kubernetes community and open source communities more broadly. Among the topics we covered in the podcast were the challenges inherent in shifting from a company-led project to a community-led one, principles that can lead to more successful communities, and how to structure decision-making.
  • How Microsoft helped Docker with LinuxKit and Moby Project [Ed: Microsoft 'helped'... embrace, extend, coerce; haven't Docker employees learned from history?]
    Today, supporting Linux is as critical to Microsoft as it is to Red Hat and SUSE.
  • How to make branding decisions in an open community
    On April 18, Docker founder Solomon Hykes made a big announcement via a pull request in the main Docker repo: "Docker is transitioning all of its open source collaborations to the Moby project going forward." The docker/docker repo now redirects to moby/moby, and Solomon's pull request updates the README and logo for the project to match. Reaction from the Docker community has been overwhelmingly negative. As of this writing, the Moby pull request has garnered 7 upvotes and 110 downvotes on GitHub. The Docker community is understandably frustrated by this opaque announcement of a fait accompli, an important decision that a hidden inner circle made behind closed doors. It's a textbook case of "Why wasn't I consulted?"