Binary Drivers May Be Banned
Greg Kroah-Hartman appears to be working on a kernel patch which will only allow drivers licensed under the GPL to be loaded into the kernel - at least, that’s what he said in passing in a longer conversation about driver core patches.
While I respect free software and what that freedom stands for, if this patch were to be included into the Linux kernel in the future (which may stop us from using proprietary drivers such as those for some graphics and wireless cards), this would almost be a form of entrapment.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- 1458 reads
- PDF version
More in Tux Machines
- Highlights
- Front Page
- Latest Headlines
- Archive
- Recent comments
- All-Time Popular Stories
- Hot Topics
- New Members
digiKam 7.7.0 is releasedAfter three months of active maintenance and another bug triage, the digiKam team is proud to present version 7.7.0 of its open source digital photo manager. See below the list of most important features coming with this release. |
Dilution and Misuse of the "Linux" Brand
|
Samsung, Red Hat to Work on Linux Drivers for Future TechThe metaverse is expected to uproot system design as we know it, and Samsung is one of many hardware vendors re-imagining data center infrastructure in preparation for a parallel 3D world. Samsung is working on new memory technologies that provide faster bandwidth inside hardware for data to travel between CPUs, storage and other computing resources. The company also announced it was partnering with Red Hat to ensure these technologies have Linux compatibility. |
today's howtos
|
It's over. Crisis averted.
"If we change the kernel this way, it prevents valid and legal
usages of the kernel. So I am wrong, sorry."
Full Post.
----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?
Shouldn't we keep this quiet?
I hate missing a crisis, especially when I don't understand it. We were going to be prevented from doing something illegal but not any more.
We can't have that, can we?
For seekers only
re: Shouldn't we keep this quiet?
I don't know. I guess there are valid reasons for the developers' wish (and gpl-only mod), but all I could think about was 'nooooo, I gotta have my NVIDIA drivers!' So, I wasn't very objective.
PCLOS developers said they'd just back out of the patch so they could continue to support some of the hardware in question, and it was said we all could do the same, but when the web is overflowing with howtos on how to apt-get some piece of software or see which group a user belongs to, I don't think too many folks gonna know how.
I guess my viewpoint was quite selfish, in fact. Even after all the reasons for the developers' first action was explained to me, still all I can think was 'thank goodness Linus put an end to that.'
For all of my fair play and do-what's-right morals, gaming wins out!
----
You talk the talk, but do you waddle the waddle?