Language Selection

English French German Italian Portuguese Spanish

Windows vs GNU/Linux vs MacOSX - the showdown

Filed under
OS

I’ve been a Windows user since Windows 3.1, a Desktop GNU/Linux user since August and a MacOSX user for some weeks.

I will share with you what I was able to learn from my experience with these operative systems.

Contender number one: Windows XP

Windows XP is not so bad as an OS. It has a lot of hardware drivers available, runs on pretty much any modern PC and also on the recent Mac-Intels with Bootcamp. Also it has a lot of software that runs natively on it along with most of the PC games industry.

Contender number two: GNU/Linux

Both GNU/Linux distributions I tested were rock-solid and both were very user-friendly. Yea, GNU/Linux isn’t just for geeks anymore. Just grab a copy of openSuse or even better - Ubuntu. Try them for a week on your PC and give me a good reason not to use them over Windows as a general-use OS. If you just need to check your e-mail, browse the web and do some word processing or spreadsheet work then GNU/Linux has all you’ll need in a much more secure and stable environment than Windows.

Last contender: MacOSX.

Last, but not the least, MacOSX is my OS of choice. As I stated previously, I was a Windows user for over 12 years and a GNU/Linux user for some months, but after a few days of using MacOSX I fell in love with it. It’s not perfect but it’s pretty close. From the user-interface to the OS’s structure it’s all solid, polished and well developed.

Full Post.

More in Tux Machines

today's leftovers

Proposed: A Tainted Performance State For The Linux Kernel

Similar to the kernel states of having a tainted kernel for using binary blob kernel modules or unsigned modules, a new tainting method has been proposed for warning the user about potentially adverse kernel performance. Dave Hansen of Intel has proposed a new "TAINT_PERFORMANCE" for the kernel that would proactively print a warning message about not using the kernel for any performance measurements. Dave explained in his RFC announcement, "I have more than once myself been the victim of an accidentally-enabled kernel configuration option being mistaken for a true performance problem. I'm sure I've also taken profiles or performance measurements and assumed they were real-world when really I was measuring the performance with an option that nobody turns on in production. A warning like this late in boot will help remind folks when these kinds of things are enabled." Read more

Scientific Linux 7.0 x86_64 BETA 3

Fermilab's intention is to continue the development and support of Scientific Linux and refine its focus as an operating system for scientific computing. Today we are announcing a beta release of Scientific Linux 7. We continue to develop a stable process for generating and distributing Scientific Linux, with the intent that Scientific Linux remains the same high quality operating system the community has come to expect. Please do not install Pre-Release software in your production environment. Read more

Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic Unicorn) Now Features Linux Kernel 3.16.1

"The Utopic kernel has been rebased to the first v3.16.1 upstream stable kernel and uploaded to the archive, ie. linux-3.16.0-9.14. Please test and let us know your results," says Canonical's Joseph Salisbury, after the latest Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting. Read more